Judgment

She-Hulk: Attorney at Law

2022 · tv · Judged 2026-01-24

Moderate Wokeness · 50

The raw score runs 0 to 100. Low is under 30. Moderate is 30 to 60. High is above 60.

This is a model judgment of how the work is talked about in public. It is not a measurement of the work itself.

Model summary

Breakdown: 4 High · 2 Moderate · 4 Low

Quoted phrases in these summaries were written by the model. They are not a saved archive of posts.

Forced diversity

High

Users decry 'forced DEI casting' and 'quota-driven diverse law firm ensemble' disconnected from story, citing 'race/gender swaps in Marvel' reactions.

Social justice messaging

High

Predominant sentiment calls out 'SJW monologues on sexism and consent' like Title IX episode, paralleling #MeToo.

Gender role reversals

High

High criticism of 'girlboss She-Hulk outperforming emasculated men' like Bruce Banner, with phrases like 'toxic masculinity mockery' and 'incompetent male comic relief'.

Anti-white viewpoints

Low

Minimal mentions; users note lack of 'anti-white privilege checks' or white villains as oppressors.

Focus on homosexuality

Moderate

Moderate backlash to 'non-binary character scenes' and LGBTQ+ inclusions like Darcie's pronouns, called 'gay agenda shoehorned in'.

Marxist sympathies

Low

Low discussion; no strong 'class struggle' or anti-meritocracy sentiments noted in recent posts.

Anti-capitalism

Low

Low; occasional gripes about 'corporate law firm greed' but not central.

Victimhood narratives

Moderate

Users highlight 'Jen's constant misogyny victimhood' defining her arc, with 'trauma-fueled Hulk rage' complaints.

Historical revisionism

Low

Low; no historical content, thus no revisionism debates.

Anti-traditional

High

High for 'anti-marriage, pro-single feminist vibes' mocking traditional relationships, plus 'chosen family over nuclear' empowerment.