Judgment

Pluribus

2025 · tv · Judged 2026-01-24

Low Wokeness · 0

The raw score runs 0 to 100. Low is under 30. Moderate is 30 to 60. High is above 60.

This is a model judgment of how the work is talked about in public. It is not a measurement of the work itself.

Model summary

Breakdown: 0 High · 0 Moderate · 10 Low

Quoted phrases in these summaries were written by the model. They are not a saved archive of posts.

Forced diversity

Low

Recent X discussions on 'pluribus' are minimal and do not highlight forced diversity; no posts like 'forced DEI casting' or 'quota hires in Pluribus' appear prominently.

Social justice messaging

Low

Sparse X sentiment shows no strong mentions of SJW messaging; users focus on plot rather than phrases like 'BLM lectures' or 'woke sermons'.

Gender role reversals

Low

No predominant X complaints about girlboss tropes or emasculated men; rare posts ignore gender dynamics entirely.

Anti-white viewpoints

Low

X users do not flag anti-white narratives; absent are terms like 'white villain agenda' or 'privilege checks' in Pluribus threads.

Focus on homosexuality

Low

Limited discussions with zero emphasis on gay subplots; no examples of 'forced LGBTQ arcs' or 'pride propaganda' in recent tweets.

Marxist sympathies

Low

No X buzz on class warfare themes; phrases like 'eat the rich' or 'proletariat heroes' are not associated with the show.

Anti-capitalism

Low

X sentiment lacks anti-corp critiques; no viral posts decrying 'corporate greed plots' or 'capitalist villains' in Pluribus.

Victimhood narratives

Low

Few X mentions of oppression stories; no common gripes like 'endless trauma porn' or 'victim Olympics'.

Historical revisionism

Low

Obscure show with no X discourse on rewriting history; absent are 'anachronistic wokeness' or 'myth-busting monologues' complaints.

Anti-traditional

Low

X reactions do not criticize family or religious norms; no posts on 'anti-Christian' or 'polyamory push' in the show.